Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

habrok:advanced_job_management:job_prioritization [2020/12/22 10:08] – external edit 127.0.0.1habrok:advanced_job_management:job_prioritization [2024/01/15 10:48] (current) – camarocico
Line 14: Line 14:
     (PriorityWeightPartition) * (partition_factor)  +     (PriorityWeightPartition) * (partition_factor)  +
     (PriorityWeightQOS)       * (QOS_factor)        +     (PriorityWeightQOS)       * (QOS_factor)        +
-    (possibly some more advanced factors that are not relevant for Peregrine)+    (possibly some more advanced factors that are not relevant for Habrok)
 </code> </code>
 All the factors in these formulas are floating point numbers between 0.0 and 1.0, while the weights are integer values that determine how important these factors should be considered. All the factors in these formulas are floating point numbers between 0.0 and 1.0, while the weights are integer values that determine how important these factors should be considered.
  
-On Peregrine we use the following weights in our SLURM configuration:+On Habrok we use the following weights in our SLURM configuration:
  
 <code> <code>
-PriorityWeightAge=5000 +PriorityWeightAge=2500000 
-PriorityWeightFairshare=100000+PriorityWeightFairshare=10000000
 PriorityWeightJobSize=0 PriorityWeightJobSize=0
 PriorityWeightPartition=0 PriorityWeightPartition=0
-PriorityWeightQOS=0+PriorityWeightQOS=1000000
 </code> </code>
 This means that the priority of a job is mainly determined by a fairshare component and a little bit by its age.\\ This means that the priority of a job is mainly determined by a fairshare component and a little bit by its age.\\